Who are you? A few Laws.
Pay close attention to the Previous Video Number 7 and you probably need to listen to it again and read the transcripts at Cancel1Mortgage.info Blog.
In Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, the Supreme Court ruled: “Whatever the form in which the government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes a risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” Also see, Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 389; United States v. Stewart, 311 U.S. 60; and generally, in re Floyd Acceptances, 7 Wall. 666. (Emphasis added.)
Continental Casualty Co. v. United States, 113 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1940):
“Public officers are merely the agents of the public, whose powers and authority are defined and limited by law. Any act without the scope of the authority so defined does not bind the principal, and all persons dealing with such agents are charged with knowledge of the extent of their authority,” 113 F.2d, at 286. (Emphasis added.)
“It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.” American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442. (1950) (Emphasis added.)
What to say when confronted by a Government AGENT.
Therefore I do hereby respectfully demand that you fully and completely identify:
- who you are, and
- what is your authority, and
- who is your principal, and
- who is the real party of interest, and
- who understands this matter, and
- where is the signed charging instrument, and
- by what authority (and nexus) do you move in this matter?
“The law creates a presumption, where the burden is on a party to prove a material fact peculiarly within his knowledge and he fails without excuse to testify, that his testimony if introduced, would be adverse to his interests.” citing Meier v CIR, 199 F 2d 392, 396 (8th Cir. 1952) (quoting 20 Am Jur, Evidence Sec 190, page 193. (Emphasis added.)
Silence is acquiescence.
Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385,391. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law”. See also: U.S. V. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297. “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” (Emphasis added.)
An Agency cannot be proven out of the mouth of the agent (attorney or bank officer Agent), and must be proven out of the mouth of the principal, Bank, or registered Corporation.
See, Texas Jur. AGENCY 3 Tex Jur 3rd.
Think About It!
Pay with PayPal or Your Credit Card below..
224 total views, 2 views today