Consent Under MAXIMS OF LAW Once Given is Gone – Part 13

More Stature Court Cases.

All laws, rules, and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180] (judicial review)

“There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.” Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.

“A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.” Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, at 113.

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights.” Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946.

Execution of process and the performance of duty by constituted officers must not be thwarted.

But these agents, servants of a Government, servants of a Corporation, and a society whose existence and strength come from these constitutional safeguards, are serving the law when they respect, not override, these guarantees. The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot thus be converted into a crime. Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489.

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.
(Oath of Public Office).”). Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)!
Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the territorial Federal supreme law of the land.

The judge is engaged in acts of treason.

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that “no state legislator, executive, or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it”. This is TREASON! In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188);
Can a government legally put restrictions on the rights of the American people at any time, for any reason?

The answer is found in Article Six of the second and third rewritten Corporate Territorial Federal U.S. Constitutions: “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no ‘rule making’ or legislation which would abrogate them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 426, 491; 86 S. Ct. 1603.
Think about it..